Respons Siswa terhadap Kitab Al-Mu'in fi Al-Nahwu Berbasis Mind Mapping Kontekstual: Evaluasi Persepsi pada Pembelajaran Nahwu di Madrasah Aliyah

Dedy Rizaldi; Mukhlisah; Badruzzaman

doi:10.59698/nasir.v4i1.627

Authors

Dedy Rizaldi Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, Indonesia
Mukhlisah Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh
Badruzzaman Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59698/nasir.v4i1.627

Keywords:

bahan ajar nahwu, mind mapping, pembelajaran kontekstual, respons siswa, bahasa Arab

Abstract

Pembelajaran nahwu di madrasah dan pesantren menghadapi tantangan karena kaidah gramatikal sering dipersepsikan abstrak, padat, dan sulit dihubungkan dengan penggunaan bahasa sehari-hari. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis respons siswa terhadap Kitab Al-Mu'in fi Al-Nahwu yang disajikan melalui mind mapping dan contoh kontekstual pada kelas X Madrasah Aliyah Swasta Imam Syafii Sibreh, Aceh Besar. Penelitian menggunakan desain survei deskriptif kuantitatif dengan 32 siswa sebagai responden. Instrumen terdiri atas 10 pernyataan skala Likert 1–5 yang mencakup kemudahan pemahaman, kejelasan penyajian, hubungan antartopik, desain visual, relevansi contoh, dukungan pendekatan kontekstual, interaktivitas, kualitas latihan, kemampuan menyusun kalimat, dan kepuasan umum. Verifikasi ulang terhadap skor butir pada data mentah menghasilkan skor total 1.418 dari maksimum 1.600 atau 88,63%, dengan rerata skor individual 44,31 (SD = 4,17) dan reliabilitas internal Cronbach's alpha sebesar 0,783. Item dengan respons tertinggi adalah kemudahan memahami konsep nahwu (95,00%), sedangkan item terendah adalah relevansi contoh dengan kehidupan sehari-hari (85,62%), meskipun seluruh item tetap berada pada kategori sangat baik. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa siswa menerima bahan ajar secara sangat positif, terutama pada aspek organisasi visual, keterbacaan hubungan antarkaidah, dan kemudahan memahami materi. Namun, karena penelitian hanya mengukur persepsi pascapenggunaan tanpa tes hasil belajar atau kelompok pembanding, hasil tidak dapat ditafsirkan sebagai bukti efektivitas kausal. Studi ini menegaskan pentingnya menggabungkan visualisasi konseptual, konteks penggunaan bahasa, latihan bertahap, dan evaluasi objektif dalam pengembangan bahan ajar nahwu.

References

Budd, J. W. (2004). Mind maps as classroom exercises. The Journal of Economic Education, 35(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.35.1.35-46

Chang, J.-H., Chiu, P.-S., & Huang, Y.-M. (2018). A sharing mind map-oriented approach to enhance collaborative mobile learning with digital archiving systems. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.3168

D'Antoni, A. V., Zipp, G. P., Olson, V. G., & Cahill, T. F. (2010). Does the mind map learning strategy facilitate information retrieval and critical thinking in medical students? BMC Medical Education, 10, 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-10-61

Davies, M. (2011). Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: What are the differences and do they matter? Higher Education, 62(3), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9387-6

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266

Fiorella, L. (2023). Making sense of generative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 35, 50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09769-7

Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). Eight ways to promote generative learning. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 717–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9348-9

Firdausiyah, Z., & Wijaya, M. (2023). Implementasi metode mindmapp dalam pembelajaran ilmu nahwu siswi XI Program Keagamaan MAN 1 Probolinggo. Lisanuna: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Arab dan Pembelajarannya, 13(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.22373/ls.v13i1.18026

Gilmore, A. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 40(2), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004144

Guariento, W., & Morley, J. (2001). Text and task authenticity in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal, 55(4), 347–353. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.4.347

Hattie, J. A. C., & Donoghue, G. M. (2016). Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. npj Science of Learning, 1, 16013. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.13

Hazaymeh, W. A., & Alomery, M. K. (2022). The effectiveness of visual mind mapping strategy for improving English language learners' critical thinking skills and reading ability. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.141

Islamiy, F. T., & Fahyuni, E. F. (2024). Development of Arabic teaching modules based on constructivism with a communicative approach. Al Mahāra: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 10(2), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.14421/almahara.2024.0102-05

Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331(6018), 772–775. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199327

Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10, 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905780

Kojin, K., & Choiruddin, C. (2022). Learning Nahwu using mind mapping method in a modern Islamic boarding school. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(4), 6603–6610. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i4.2758

Kurniati, D., Nopiyanti, & Arifa, Z. (2021). Model pembelajaran Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) dalam pembelajaran bahasa Arab. Lahjah Arabiyah: Jurnal Bahasa Arab dan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 2(2), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.35316/lahjah.v2i2.133-140

Liaw, S.-S. (2008). Investigating students' perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 864–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.005

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2

Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Harris, N. R., Sanders, T., Parker, P., del Pozo Cruz, B., & Lonsdale, C. (2022). Multimedia design for learning: An overview of reviews with meta-meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 92(3), 413–454. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211052329

Peacock, M. (1997). The effect of authentic materials on the motivation of EFL learners. ELT Journal, 51(2), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.2.144

Rahmawati, R. D., Nashoih, A. K., Tamaji, S. T., & Sa'idah, A. (2024). Implementasi strategi joyful learning dengan teknik mind map pada pembelajaran nahwu di Pondok Pesantren Al-Hikmah Bahrul Ulum. EDUSCOPE: Jurnal Pendidikan, Pembelajaran, dan Teknologi, 10(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.32764/eduscope.v10i1.4745

Roediger, H. L., III, & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x

Sari, R. M., Sumarmi, Astina, I. K., Utomo, D. H., & Ridhwan. (2021). Increasing students' critical thinking skills and learning motivation using inquiry mind map. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(3), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i03.16515

Schroeder, N. L., Nesbit, J. C., Anguiano, C. J., & Adesope, O. O. (2018). Studying and constructing concept maps: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 431–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9403-9

Shi, Y., Yang, H., Dou, Y., & Zeng, Y. (2023). Effects of mind mapping-based instruction on student cognitive learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 24(3), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09746-9

Sidik, A., & Muassomah, M. (2021). Implementasi metode mind mapping dengan menggunakan media PowerPoint dalam pembelajaran nahwu. Alsina: Journal of Arabic Studies, 3(2), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.21580/alsina.3.2.6734

Sun, P.-C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.-Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007

Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09465-5

Tanriseven, I. (2014). A tool that can be effective in the self-regulated learning of pre-service teachers: The mind map. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n1.1

Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching, 45(2), 143–179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000528

Utami, N., Yahrif, M., Rosmayanti, V., & Siradjuddin, S. (2023). The effectiveness of contextual teaching and learning in improving students' reading comprehension. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 11(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i1.6732