An Analysis of Speech Acts in English Lesson in Madrasah Aliyah Al Irsyad Tengaran

Authors

  • Henry Anwar Faiz Universitas Islam Negeri Salatiga, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59698/afeksi.v5i3.276

Keywords:

analysis, speech act, english lesson

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the speech act used by the teacher and students in an English lesson in Grade X of MA Al Irsyad Tengaran. It is designed as a qualitative research. The data were gathered by observing the class and recording the lesson, and then the data was analyzed to get the result. The result indicates that the directive speech act is the most frequently used in teaching and learning. It can be seen from the data that directive speech is the highest, i.e., 145 utterances or 49,5%, followed by representatives with 103 utterances or 35,2%. Commissives with 27 utterances or equal with 9,2%, and the last one is expressive with 18 utterances or 6,1% from the total of approximately 293 utterances. The dominance of directive speech acts in English learning shows that the teacher plays a vital role in directing and managing class activities. Clear and firm instructions from teachers help create a structured and controlled learning environment, allowing students to follow directions well and understand assigned tasks.

Author Biography

Henry Anwar Faiz, Universitas Islam Negeri Salatiga

Student of Magister in UIN Salatiga

References

Aldrup, K., Carstensen, B., & Klusmann, U. (2022). Is empathy the key to effective teaching? A systematic review of its association with teacher-student interactions and student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1177-1216.

Andewi, W., & Waziana, W. (2019). An analysis of teacher’s speech acts in teaching and learning process. Teknosastik, 17(1), 29-34.

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do Things with Words. 2nd. Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bach, Kent. (1994). Meaning, Speech Acts, and Communication. In Basic Topics in the Philosophy of Language, ed. Robert Harnish, 3-21. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall.

Bakic-Tomic, L., Dvorski, J., & Kirinic, A. (2015). Elements of teacher communication competence: An examination of skills and knowledge to communicate. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 157-166.

Basra, S., & Thoyyibah, L. (2017). A speech act analysis of teacher talk in an EFL classroom. International Journal of Education, 10(1), 73-81.

Buck, R & Vanlear C. Arthur. (2002). Verbal and Nonverbal Communication: Distinguishing Symbolic, Spontaneous, and Pseudo-Spontaneous Nonverbal Behavior. Journal of Communication. 15, 522-528.

Crystal, D. (1985). A dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 2nd. edition. Oxford: Blackwell.

Da Luz, F. S. D. R. (2015). The relationship between teachers and students in the classroom: Communicative language teaching approach and cooperative learning strategy to improve learning.

Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking skills and Creativity, 12, 43-52.

Hufford, C., & Heasley, P. (1983). Semantics: A Coursebook. Cambridge University Press.

Kiefer, S. M., Alley, K. M., & Ellerbrock, C. R. (2015). Teacher and peer support for young adolescents’ motivation, engagement, and school belonging. Rmle Online, 38(8), 1-18.

Leenders, H., De Jong, J., Monfrance, M., & Haelermans, C. (2019). Building strong parent–teacher relationships in primary education: The challenge of two-way communication. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(4), 519-533.

Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. SAGE International Education and Professional Publisher.

Palmer, E. (2014). Teaching the Core Skills of Listening and Speaking: ASCD. ASCD.

Pollock, J. E., & Tolone, L. J. (2020). Improving student learning one teacher at a time. ASCD.

Rini, Setia. (2010). Violating the Maxims of Quality and Quantity on the ‘Demo Sabun’ Sketch of Extravaganza Situation Comedy TV. REGISTER, VOL. 3, No. 2, 2010.

Rommetveit, R. (2014). Words, Meaning, and Messages: Theory and Experiments in Psycholinguistics. Academic Press.

Salemink, K., Strijker, D., & Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 360-371.

Searle, J.R., (1969). Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stroebe, W. (2016). Why good teaching evaluations may reward bad teaching: On grade inflation and other unintended consequences of student evaluations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(6), 800-816.

Sugiono, S., Noerdjanah, N., & Wahyu, A. (2020). Uji validitas dan reliabilitas alat ukur SG posture evaluation. Jurnal Keterapian Fisik, 5(1), 55-61.

Ting, S. H., Marzuki, E., Chuah, K. M., Misieng, J., & Jerome, C. (2017). Employers’ views on the importance of English proficiency and communication skill for employability in Malaysia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 315-327.

Yıldırım, S., & Yıldırım, Ö. (2016). The importance of listening in language learning and listening comprehension problems experienced by language learners: A literature review. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(4), 2094-2110.

Yule, George. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-29

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

An author who publishes in  AFEKSI agrees to the following terms:
  • Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
  • The author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.