Model Kooperatif Tipe Make A Match untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Aktivitas Siswa dalam Pendidikan Agama Kristen

Authors

  • Santrina Tualaka Institut Agama Kristen Negeri Kupang, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Yusmina Eliseba Hauoni Institut Agama Kristen Negeri Kupang, Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Andri Oktovianus Pellondou Institut Agama Kristen Negeri Kupang, Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59698/afeksi.v7i5.1068

Keywords:

Make a Match, Pembelajaran Kooperatif, Hasil belajar, Aktivitas Siswa, Pendidikan Agama Kristen, Penelitian Tindakan Kelas

Abstract

Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Kristen (PAK) pada kelas rendah sekolah dasar memerlukan strategi yang tidak hanya menyampaikan materi, tetapi juga menjaga perhatian, memberi kesempatan interaksi, dan menyediakan umpan balik yang cepat. Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Make a Match dan perubahan hasil belajar, aktivitas siswa, serta aktivitas guru selama tiga siklus tindakan di kelas III SDI Bertingkat Kelapa Lima 3 Kupang. Penelitian menggunakan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas yang terdiri atas perencanaan, pelaksanaan, observasi, dan refleksi pada setiap siklus. Subjek penelitian adalah 19 siswa, terdiri atas 7 laki-laki dan 12 perempuan. Data dikumpulkan melalui tes hasil belajar, lembar observasi aktivitas siswa, lembar observasi aktivitas guru, dan dokumentasi, kemudian dianalisis secara deskriptif menggunakan rata-rata, persentase ketuntasan, dan perbandingan antarsiklus. Pada kondisi awal, hanya 7 siswa (37%) mencapai KKM 75. Pada Siklus I, nilai rata-rata mencapai 72 dengan ketuntasan 68%, aktivitas siswa 53%, dan aktivitas guru 67,5%. Pada Siklus II, nilai rata-rata meningkat menjadi 82, ketuntasan 89%, aktivitas siswa 89%, dan aktivitas guru 80%. Pada Siklus III, nilai rata-rata mencapai 86, seluruh siswa (100%) mencapai KKM, aktivitas siswa 100%, dan aktivitas guru 87,5%. Ketuntasan klasikal meningkat 63 poin persentase dari kondisi awal hingga Siklus III. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa Make a Match, ketika disertai perbaikan instruksi, pengelolaan kelas, pembagian kelompok, waktu eksplorasi, dan LKPD berdasarkan refleksi siklus, mendukung peningkatan bertahap hasil belajar dan keterlibatan siswa dalam konteks kelas yang diteliti. Karena desain PTK tidak menggunakan kelompok pembanding, hasil ini dipahami sebagai bukti perbaikan praktik kelas, bukan estimasi efek kausal yang dapat digeneralisasikan.

References

Adl-Amini, K., Völlinger, V. A., & Eckart, A. (2024). Implementation quality of cooperative learning and teacher beliefs—A mixed methods study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39, 2267–2281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00769-3

Archer-Kath, J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Individual versus group feedback in cooperative groups. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134(5), 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1994.9922999

Arni, Y., Putri, A., Marlina, S., & Tantri, S. T. (2024). Implementation in improving mathematics learning outcomes of the elementary school students using Make a Match cooperative learning model. Continuous Education: Journal of Science and Research, 5(1), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.51178/ce.v5i1.1808

Aust, L., Schütze, B., Hochweber, J., & Souvignier, E. (2024). Effects of formative assessment on intrinsic motivation in primary school mathematics instruction. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39, 2177–2200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00768-4

Bartholomew, J. B., Jowers, E. M., Roberts, G., Fall, A.-M., & Errisuriz, V. L. (2018). Active learning improves on-task behaviors in 4th grade children. Preventive Medicine, 111, 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.02.023

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

Blatchford, P., Kutnick, P., Baines, E., & Galton, M. (2003). Toward a social pedagogy of classroom group work. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1–2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00078-8

Damayanti, E., Nur, F., Anggereni, S., & Taufiq, A. U. (2023). The effect of cooperative learning on learning motivation: A meta-analysis. Buletin Psikologi, 31(1), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.22146/buletinpsikologi.59583

Dewi, N. A., Wesnawa, I. G. A., & Kertih, I. W. (2021). Model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Make a Match berbantuan media peta pikiran, keterampilan sosial dan kompetensi pengetahuan ilmu pengetahuan sosial (IPS). Jurnal Pendidikan IPS Indonesia, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/pips.v5i1.242

Ebrahim, A. (2012). The effect of cooperative learning strategies on elementary students’ science achievement and social skills in Kuwait. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 293–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9293-0

Fauhah, H., & Rosy, B. (2021). Analisis model pembelajaran Make a Match terhadap hasil belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran (JPAP), 9(2), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpap.v9n2.p321-334

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Ghaith, G. M. (2018). Teacher perceptions of the challenges of implementing concrete and conceptual cooperative learning. Issues in Educational Research, 28(2), 385–404. https://www.iier.org.au/iier28/ghaith.pdf

Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3

Gillies, R. M., & Boyle, M. (2010). Teachers’ reflections on cooperative learning: Issues of implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 933–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.034

Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Rohrbeck, C. A., & Fantuzzo, J. W. (2006). A meta-analytic review of social, self-concept, and behavioral outcomes of peer-assisted learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 732–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.732

Hasni, P., & Amelia, C. (2024). The effect of Make A Match cooperative learning model on mathematics problem solving ability in elementary school. Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v5i2.948

Hashim, S. N. A., & Yusoff, N. M. (2021). The use of reflective practice towards achieving effective English language teaching at primary schools. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 364–374. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20956

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Hondrich, A. L., Hertel, S., Adl-Amini, K., & Klieme, E. (2016). Implementing curriculum-embedded formative assessment in primary school science classrooms. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(3), 353–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1049113

Hutapea, R. H. (2020). Model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Make a Match dalam Pendidikan Agama Kristen. SOTIRIA: Jurnal Theologia dan Pendidikan Agama Kristen, 3(1), 1–10. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ba84/fa3bd220ca9d44be9750494d861c294e7f00.pdf

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057

Kingston, N., & Nash, B. (2011). Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(4), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2011.00220.x

Kyndt, E., Raes, E., Lismont, B., Timmers, F., Cascallar, E., & Dochy, F. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning: Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings? Educational Research Review, 10, 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.002

Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(3), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7054

Mendo-Lázaro, S., León-del-Barco, B., Polo-del-Río, M. I., & López-Ramos, V. M. (2022). The impact of cooperative learning on university students’ academic goals. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 787210. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.787210

Nichols, J. D., & Miller, R. B. (1994). Cooperative learning and student motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1015

Purnama, H. I. (2022). Applying “Make a Match” model-based on scientific approach through reward education game for elementary school students. International Journal of Theory and Application in Elementary and Secondary School Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.31098/ijtaese.v4i1.674

Purba, M. U. (2023). Pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran Make A Match terhadap minat belajar Pendidikan Agama Kristen dan Budi Pekerti siswa kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Pagaran Kabupaten Tapanuli Utara tahun pembelajaran 2023/2024. Jurnal Teologi Injili dan Pendidikan Agama, 1(4), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.55606/jutipa.v1i4.192

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795

Slavin, R. E. (2014). Cooperative learning and academic achievement: Why does groupwork work? Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 785–791. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.201201

Utari, F. D., & Fadlillah, M. (2024). Pengaruh model kooperatif tipe Make A Match terhadap hasil belajar siswa kelas V SDN Sumbertanggul 2 Kabupaten Mojokerto. Journal of Education for All, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.61692/edufa.v2i3.158

Wardhani, R. (2021). Make A Match untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar Pendidikan Agama Kristen. Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar, 5(3), 701–714. https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v5i3.295

Xuan, Q., Cheung, A., & Sun, D. (2022). The effectiveness of formative assessment for enhancing reading achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 990196. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9443994/

Downloads

Published

2026-08-23

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check