Profil Kompetensi Guru dan Engagement Siswa Berdasarkan Persepsi Guru di SD Negeri Ciwuni 01

Noviana Hartati; Sandi Aji Wahyu Utomo

doi:10.59698/afeksi.v7i6.1060

Authors

Noviana Hartati Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Al Ghazali Cilacap, Indonesia
Sandi Aji Wahyu Utomo Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Al Ghazali Cilacap, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59698/afeksi.v7i6.1060

Keywords:

Kompetensi Guru, Engagement Siswa, Keterlibatan Belajar, Sekolah Dasar, Survei Deskriptif

Abstract

Kompetensi guru dan keterlibatan siswa merupakan dua komponen penting dalam mutu proses pembelajaran. Namun, naskah penelitian deskriptif sering menafsirkan kemunculan dua profil yang sama-sama tinggi sebagai bukti hubungan statistik, padahal kesimpulan tersebut memerlukan analisis inferensial. Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan profil kompetensi guru dan engagement siswa berdasarkan persepsi guru di SD Negeri Ciwuni 01. Penelitian menggunakan desain survei kuantitatif deskriptif dengan sampling jenuh terhadap 16 guru. Instrumen kompetensi guru terdiri atas 37 butir yang mencakup dimensi pedagogik, kepribadian, sosial, dan profesional, sedangkan instrumen engagement siswa terdiri atas 20 butir yang mencakup keterlibatan perilaku, emosional, dan kognitif. Analisis dilakukan menggunakan frekuensi, persentase, dan kategorisasi skor. Seluruh butir memenuhi kriteria korelasi butir-total yang digunakan dalam sampel penelitian. Konsistensi internal instrumen sangat tinggi, dengan Cronbach’s alpha 0,960 untuk kompetensi guru dan 0,889 untuk engagement siswa. Sebanyak 9 guru (56,3%) menilai kompetensinya berada pada kategori tinggi dan 7 guru (43,8%) pada kategori sangat tinggi. Persepsi guru terhadap engagement siswa berada pada kategori sedang sebanyak 3 responden (18,8%), tinggi sebanyak 6 responden (37,5%), dan sangat tinggi sebanyak 7 responden (43,8%). Hasil ini menunjukkan profil positif pada kedua konstruk, tetapi tidak membuktikan adanya hubungan atau pengaruh karena penelitian tidak melakukan uji korelasi dan engagement dinilai melalui persepsi guru. Temuan berfungsi sebagai data dasar bagi sekolah untuk memperkuat praktik pembelajaran yang mendukung partisipasi, relasi positif, regulasi diri, dan keterlibatan kognitif siswa. Penelitian lanjutan perlu menggunakan laporan siswa, observasi kelas, sampel yang lebih luas, dan analisis hubungan antarkonstruk.

References

Aelterman, N., Vansteenkiste, M., Haerens, L., Soenens, B., Fontaine, J. R. J., & Reeve, J. (2019). Toward an integrative and fine-grained insight in motivating and demotivating teaching styles: The merits of a circumplex approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(3), 497–521. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000293

Blazar, D., & Kraft, M. A. (2017). Teacher and teaching effects on students’ attitudes and behaviors. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(1), 146–170. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716670260

Blömeke, S., Jentsch, A., Ross, N., Kaiser, G., & König, J. (2022). Opening up the black box: Teacher competence, instructional quality, and students’ learning progress. Learning and Instruction, 79 Article 101600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101600

Cents-Boonstra, M., Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A., Lara, M. M., & Denessen, E. (2022). Patterns of motivating teaching behaviour and student engagement: A microanalytic approach. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 37 227–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-021-00543-3

Dewaele, J.-M., & Li, C. (2021). Teacher enthusiasm and students’ social-behavioral learning engagement: The mediating role of student enjoyment and boredom in Chinese EFL classes. Language Teaching Research Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211014538

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Gebre, Z. A., Demissie, M. M., & Yimer, B. M. (2025). The impact of teacher socio-emotional competence on student engagement: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 16 Article 1526371. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1526371

Guo, Q., Samsudin, S., Yang, X., Gao, J., Ramlan, M. A., Abdullah, B., & Farizan, N. H. (2023). Relationship between perceived teacher support and student engagement in physical education: A systematic review. Sustainability, 15(7), Article 6039. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076039

Hanaysha, J. R., Shriedeh, F. B., & In’airat, M. (2023). Impact of classroom environment, teacher competency, information and communication technology resources, and university facilities on student engagement and academic performance. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 3(2), Article 100188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100188

Huang, L., & Wang, D. (2023). Teacher support, academic self-efficacy, student engagement, and academic achievement in emergency online learning. Behavioral Sciences, 13(9), Article 704. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13090704

Liu, X. (2024). Effect of teacher–student relationship on academic engagement: The mediating roles of perceived social support and academic pressure. Frontiers in Psychology, 15 Article 1331667. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1331667

Peng, C. (2021). A conceptual review of teacher enthusiasm and students’ success and engagement in Chinese EFL classes. Frontiers in Psychology, 12 Article 742970. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.742970

Pham, Y. K., Murray, C., & Gau, J. (2022). The inventory of teacher–student relationships: Factor structure and associations with school engagement among high-risk youth. Psychology in the Schools, 59(2), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22617

Quin, D. (2017). Longitudinal and contextual associations between teacher–student relationships and student engagement: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 345–387. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316669434

Rautanen, P., Soini, T., Pietarinen, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2021). Primary school students’ perceived social support in relation to study engagement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36 653–672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00492-3

Reeve, J., & Cheon, S. H. (2021). Autonomy-supportive teaching: Its malleability, benefits, and potential to improve educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 56(1), 54–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1862657

Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002

Roorda, D. L., Jak, S., Zee, M., Oort, F. J., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2017). Affective teacher–student relationships and students’ engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic update and test of the mediating role of engagement. School Psychology Review, 46(3), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0035.V46-3

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61 Article 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

Tao, Y., Meng, Y., Gao, Z., & Yang, X. (2022). Perceived teacher support, student engagement, and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology, 42(4), 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2022.2033168

Teig, N., & Nilsen, T. (2022). Profiles of instructional quality in primary and secondary education: Patterns, predictors, and relations to student achievement and motivation in science. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 74 Article 101170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101170

Thornberg, R., Forsberg, C., Hammar Chiriac, E., & Bjereld, Y. (2022). Teacher–student relationship quality and student engagement: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study. Research Papers in Education, 37(6), 840–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2020.1864772

Tikkanen, L., Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2021). Crossover of burnout in the classroom—Is teacher exhaustion transmitted to students? International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 9(4), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2021.1942343

Ulmanen, S., Soini, T., Pietarinen, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2022). Development of students’ social support profiles and their association with students’ study wellbeing. Developmental Psychology, 58(12), 2336–2349. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001439

Ulmanen, S., Soini, T., Pietarinen, J., Pyhältö, K., & Rautanen, P. (2022). Primary and lower secondary school students’ social support profiles and study wellbeing. Journal of Early Adolescence, 42(5), 613–646. https://doi.org/10.1177/02724316211058061

Ulmanen, S., Soini, T., Pietarinen, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2023). How do teacher support trajectories influence primary and lower-secondary school students’ study well-being? Frontiers in Psychology, 14 Article 1142469. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1142469

Vargas-Madriz, L. F., Konishi, C., & Wong, T. K. (2024). A meta-analysis of the association between teacher support and school engagement. Social Development, 33(4), Article e12745. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12745

Wang, J., Tigelaar, D. E. H., Luo, J., & Admiraal, W. (2022). Teacher beliefs, classroom process quality, and student engagement in the smart classroom learning environment: A multilevel analysis. Computers & Education, 183 Article 104501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104501

Wang, M.-T., Degol, J. L., Amemiya, J., Parr, A., & Guo, J. (2020). Classroom climate and children’s academic and psychological wellbeing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Developmental Review, 57 Article 100912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2020.100912

Wang, M.-T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Social support matters: Longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child Development, 83(3), 877–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01745.x

Wentzel, K. R., Muenks, K., McNeish, D., & Russell, S. (2017). Peer and teacher supports in relation to motivation and effort: A multilevel study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.11.002

Weyns, T., Colpin, H., De Laet, S., Engels, M., & Verschueren, K. (2018). Teacher support, peer acceptance, and engagement in the classroom: A three-wave longitudinal study in late childhood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47 1139–1150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0774-5

Yang, D., Chen, P., Wang, H., Wang, K., & Huang, R. (2022). Teachers’ autonomy support and student engagement: A systematic literature review of longitudinal studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 13 Article 925955. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925955

Yang, Y., Yuan, Y., Tan, H., Wang, Y., & Li, G. (2021). The linkages between Chinese children’s cognitive, emotional, and behavioral engagement: The mediating effect of perceptions of classroom interactions in mathematics. Psychology in the Schools, 58(10), 2017–2030. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22571

Zee, M., Rudasill, K. M., & Bosman, R. J. (2021). A cross-lagged study of students’ motivation, academic achievement, and relationships with teachers from kindergarten to sixth grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(6), 1208–1226. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000574