EFEKTIFITAS PENGGUNAAN E-LEARNING DI SEKOLAH DASAR DENGAN MODEL TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE (TAM)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35672/afeksi.v4i5.168Kata Kunci:
Covid-19, TAM, E-learningAbstrak
Pandemi COVID-19 sangat mempengaruhi efektivitas dan kualitas dalam belajar siswa, sebagai contoh di sekolah-sekolah, khususnya di sekolah dasar para guru menggunakan E-Learning platform untuk menggantikan pembelajaran tatap muka. Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi platform E-Learning Google Classroom sebagai media pembelajaran selama COVID-19. Studi ini menjaring 100 siswa kelas 1 hingga kelas 6 sekolah dasar Al Azhar Solo Baru, para siswa diberikan butir-butir pertanyaan melalui Google Form terkait penggunaan aktivitas mereka dalam belajar online menggunakan platform Google Classroom. Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) adalah framework utama paper ini untuk dianalisis, model ini terdiri dari 5 indikator : Blended E-Learning System Self-Efficacy, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, Intention to Use, Perceived Satisfaction. Software yang digunakan yaitu SMART PLS 3.0. Secara keseluruhan model yang diusulkan telah berhasil menjelaskan faktor-faktor para siswa sekolah dasar dalam manfaat yang didapat dalam menggunakan E-Learning selama pandemi COVID-19 di Indonesia.Referensi
S. Pokhrel and R. Chhetri, “A Literature Review on Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Teaching and Learning,” High. Educ. Futur., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 133–141, 2021, doi: 10.1177/2347631120983481.
N. A. Mohd Zulkefli, “Evaluating e-Learning Google Classroom tools for Computer Science Subjects during COVID-19 Pandemic,” Int. J. Adv. Trends Comput. Sci. Eng., vol. 9, no. 4, p. 6251-6258, 2020, doi: 10.30534/ijatcse/2020/304942020.
A. Gupta and P. Pathania, “To study the impact of Google Classroom as a platform of learning and collaboration at the teacher education level,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 843–857, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10294-1.
A. Rosyada and H. Sundari, “Learning from home environment: Academic writing course for efl undergraduates through google classroom application,” Stud. English Lang. Educ., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 710–725, 2021, doi: 10.24815/siele.v8i2.18374.
N. W. Sadiyani, “Google form implementation on general English assignment in polytechnic education,” Int. J. Linguist. Lit. Cult., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 93–103, 2022, doi: 10.21744/ijllc.v8n3.2083.
S. HR, H. K, and E. Elli, “The Application of Learning Model (Google and Google Form) Based Android toward Students’ Activities and Research Methodology Learning Outcomes,” J. Innov. Educ. Cult. Res., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 294–300, 2022, doi: 10.46843/jiecr.v3i3.95.
Y. Hadianti, B. Musthafa, and U. S. Fuadah, “Learning from Home Activity Using Google Form Application toward Online Learning Assessment in Elementary School,” Int. Conf. Elem. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 606–610, 2021.
M. Mailizar, D. Burg, and S. Maulina, “Examining university students’ behavioural intention to use e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An extended TAM model,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 7057–7077, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10557-5.
H. A. Alfadda and H. S. Mahdi, “Measuring Students’ Use of Zoom Application in Language Course Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM),” J. Psycholinguist. Res., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 883–900, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10936-020-09752-1.
Wu, J.-H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T.-L. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers & Education, 55(1), 155–164.
Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2014). Measuring the moderating effect of gender and age on e-learning acceptance in England: A structural equation modeling approach for an extended technology acceptance model. Educational Computing Research, 51(2), 163–184.
Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). The legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 244–254.
Szajna, B. (1996). Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Science, 42(1), 85–92.Tarhini, A., Hassouna, M., & Abbasi, M. S. (2015). Towards the acceptance of RSS to support learning : An empirical study to validate the technology acceptance model in Lebanon. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 13(1), 30–41.
Liaw, S.-S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 864–873.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.005
Runeson, P., & Höst, M. (2009). Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empirical Software Engineering,14 (2), 131–164.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10664-008- 9102-8
Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
An author who publishes in AFEKSI agrees to the following terms:- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- The author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
