Chatgpt Acceptance and Use For Generation Z Pre-Service Science Teacher: A Survey Study

Authors

  • Wahyuni Adam Universitas Sulawesi Barat
  • I Putu Yogi Pratama Master of Management, STIEPARI Semarang
  • Ilham Handika Universitas Mataram
  • Hilman Qudratuddarsi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59698/afeksi.v6i4.497

Keywords:

ChatGPT, Generation Z, Preservice science teacher, Theory of Planned Behavior, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2

Abstract

Over recent decades, AI in education has evolved into adaptive, personalized tools like ChatGPT. For Generation Z pre-service science teachers, ChatGPT supports lesson planning, reflection, and simulation. Using TPB and UTAUT2, this study explores factors influencing ChatGPT acceptance and use, offering insights to inform future teacher education programs. This study used a quantitative, cross-sectional survey design with 221 pre-service science teachers. Data were collected online using a validated instrument based on UTAUT and TPB constructs. Statistical analysis involved descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, t-tests, and ANOVA to examine ChatGPT acceptance and use patterns. The study found that Generation Z pre-service science teachers generally hold neutral to slightly positive attitudes toward ChatGPT, recognizing its ease of use and potential benefits. However, social influence, habit formation, and actual usage remain weak. Descriptive and correlation analyses show that habit, facilitating conditions, and hedonic motivation are the strongest predictors of behavioral intention and use. These results suggest that institutional support and strategies to increase habitual and enjoyable use are key to enhancing ChatGPT adoption in educational settings.

References

Afzaal, M., Shanshan, X., Yan, D., & Younas, M. (2024). Mapping artificial intelligence integration in education: a decade of innovation and impact (2013-2023)-a bibliometric analysis. IEEE Access.

Arguello, F. C., Banda, J. E. M., Chamorro, M. I., & Jiménez, A. B. (2024). Analysis of teachers'perception on the use and impact of chatgpt in contemporary education. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(10), 1-17.

Bhaskar, P., Misra, P., & Chopra, G. (2024). Shall I use ChatGPT? A study on perceived trust and perceived risk towards ChatGPT usage by teachers at higher education institutions. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 41(4), 428-447.

Biloš, A., & Budimir, B. (2024). Understanding the adoption dynamics of ChatGPT among generation Z: Insights from a modified UTAUT2 model. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research, 19(2), 863-879.

Dewi, H. R., Qudratuddarsi, H., Ningthias, D. P., & Cinthami, R. D. D. (2024). The Current Update of ChatGPT Roles in Science Experiment: A Systemic Literature Review. Saqbe: Jurnal Sains dan Pembelajarannya, 1(2), 74-85.

ElSayary, A. (2024). An investigation of teachers' perceptions of using ChatGPT as a supporting tool for teaching and learning in the digital era. Journal of computer assisted learning, 40(3), 931-945.

Guo, S., Zheng, Y., & Zhai, X. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education research during 2013–2023: A review based on bibliometric analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 29(13), 16387-16409.

Habibi, A., Mukminin, A., Octavia, A., Wahyuni, S., Danibao, B. K., & Wibowo, Y. G. (2024). ChatGPT acceptance and use through UTAUT and TPB: A big survey in five Indonesian universities. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 101136.

Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence-based nursing, 18(3), 66-67.

Hidayat, R., Lestari, S., & Qudratuddarsi, H. (2022). Achievement Goals, Metacognition and Horizontal Mathematization: A Mediational Analysis. TEM Journal, 11(4).

Jafar, A. J. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies?. Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323-324.

Jasrai, L. (2025). Extending UTAUT model to examine the usages of ChatGPT among Indian students in higher education: a structural equation modelling approach. The TQM Journal.

Jia, F., Sun, D., & Looi, C. K. (2024). Artificial intelligence in science education (2013–2023): Research trends in ten years. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 33(1), 94-117.

Lee, G. G., & Zhai, X. (2024). Using ChatGPT for science learning: A study on pre-service teachers' lesson planning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

Qudratuddarsi, H., Fauziah, A., Agung, A., & Yanti, M. (2025). “Status quo” chatgpt dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran fisika: systematic literature review. PHYDAGOGIC: Jurnal Fisika dan Pembelajarannya, 7(2), 110-118.

Qudratuddarsi, H., Hidayat, R., Nasir, N., Imami, M. K. W., & bin Mat Nor, R. (2022). Rasch validation of instrument measuring Gen-Z science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) application in teaching during the pandemic. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(6), 104-121.

Qudratuddarsi, H., Ramadhana, N., Indriyanti, N., & Ismail, A. I. (2024). Using Item Option Characteristics Curve (IOCC) to unfold misconception on chemical reaction. Journal of Tropical Chemistry Research and Education, 6(2), 105-118.

Sağın, F. G., Özkaya, A. B., Tengiz, F., Geyik, Ö. G., & Geyik, C. (2024). Current evaluation and recommendations for the use of artificial intelligence tools in education. Turkish Journal of Biochemistry, 48(6), 620-625.

Strielkowski, W., Grebennikova, V., Lisovskiy, A., Rakhimova, G., & Vasileva, T. (2024). AI‐driven adaptive learning for sustainable educational transformation. Sustainable Development.

Vartiainen, H., Valtonen, T., Kahila, J., & Tedre, M. (2025). ChatGPT and imaginaries of the future of education: insights of Finnish teacher educators. Information and Learning Sciences, 126(1/2), 75-90.

Watson, R. (2015). Quantitative research. Nursing standard, 29(31).

Yakubu, M. N., David, N., & Abubakar, N. H. (2025). Students' behavioural intention to use content generative AI for learning and research: A UTAUT theoretical perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 1-26.

Yang, Y., Chen, L., He, W., Sun, D., & Salas-Pilco, S. Z. (2024). Artificial Intelligence for enhancing special education for K-12: A decade of trends, themes, and global insights (2013–2023). International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1-49.

Yu, H. (2024). The application and challenges of ChatGPT in educational transformation: New demands for teachers' roles. Heliyon, 10(2).

Downloads

Published

2025-05-30

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 4 (2025)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

An author who publishes in  AFEKSI agrees to the following terms:
  • Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
  • The author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.