A Systematic Literature Review (SLR): Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Berpikir Kritis pada Materi Dampak Sosial Informatika

Authors

  • Cut Rizkani Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
  • Djuniadi Djuniadi Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Wiwi Isnaini Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Trimurtini Trimurtini Universitas Negeri Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59698/afeksi.v6i6.779

Keywords:

instrumen penilaian, berpikir kritis, SLR

Abstract

Kemampuan berpikir kritis merupakan kompetensi esensial di abad ke-21, terutama dalam menghadapi kompleksitas dampak sosial informatika. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan tinjauan literatur sistematis (Systematic Literature Review) guna memetakan, menganalisis, dan mensintesis penelitian-penelitian yang ada terkait pengembangan instrumen penilaian berpikir kritis pada konteks informatika, khususnya untuk siswa sekolah menengah. Menggunakan protokol PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses), peneliti mengidentifikasi ada 22 artikel relevan dari basis data Google Scholar dalam rentang waktu 2015-2025. Hasil sintesis menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar instrumen yang ada mengadaptasi kerangka kerja klasik seperti Taksonomi Bloom, namun terdapat tren menuju pengembangan asesmen berbasis skenario dan kinerja untuk mengukur keterampilan dalam konteks digital yang otentik. Indikator penilaian yang umum digunakan mencakup analisis argumen, evaluasi kredibilitas sumber, dan inferensi logis. Ditemukan pula adanya kelangkaan instrumen yang secara spesifik dirancang dan divalidasi untuk siswa kelas 8 pada materi dampak sosial informatika. SLR ini menyimpulkan adanya kebutuhan mendesak untuk mengembangkan instrumen yang valid, reliabel, dan sesuai konteks untuk mengisi kesenjangan tersebut, serta memberikan landasan teoretis dan praktis bagi penelitian pengembangan.

References

Al-Zubidy, A., & Carver, J. C. (2019). Identification and Prioritization of SLR Search Tool requirement: an SLR and a Survey. Empirical Software Engineering, 24(1), 139-169.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman

Arndt, D. M., Martins, R. M., & Hauck, J. C. R. (2025). Critical Thinking Assessment in K-12 Computing Education: A Systematic Mapping. Journal Informatics in Education, 24(1), 1– 44.

Dwyer, C. P., & Hogan, M. J. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43-52.

Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical thinking assessment. Theory into practice, 32(3), 179-186.

Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Research findings and recommendations. American Philosophical Association.

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2019). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill

Haddaway, N . R, P. M. J., P. C. C., & M. L. A. (2022). PRISMA2020 : An R packageand shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagram, with interactivity for optimized digital transparency and Open Syntesis Campbell Systematic Review.

Kong, S. C. (2015). An experience of a three-year study on the development of critical thinking skills in flipped secondary classrooms with a paperless class application. Computers & Education, 89, 16-29.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372.

Pati, D., & Larusso, L. N. (2018). How to write a Systematic Review of the Literature. Health Environment Research and Design journal, 11(1), 15-30

Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., ... & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. ESRC methods programme.

Sari, M., & Nuraini, E. (2021). Pengembangan Asesmen Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dalam Pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 12(2), 123–136.

Setiawan, R., & Sari, D. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMA dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Jurnal Pendidikan, 21(3), 89–102

Shavelson, R. J., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., & Beck, K. (2019). Assessment of university students’ critical thinking: Next generation performance assessment. Frontiers in Education, 4, 1-10.

Stupple, E. J., Maratos, F. A., Elander, J., Hunt, T. E., Cheung, K. Y., & Aubeeluck, A. V. (2017). Development of the Critical Thinking Toolkit (CriTT): A measure of student attitudes and beliefs about critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 91-100.

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. Jossey-Bass

Wulandari, A. (2020). Pengukuran Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 15(2), 45–56.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 6 (2025)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

An author who publishes in  AFEKSI agrees to the following terms:
  • Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
  • The author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.