Analysis of Problem Solving Ability Mathemathics Assessed from Student's Authorized Style

Authors

  • Dewi Saputri Arepan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35672/afeksi.v1i1.7

Keywords:

Analysis of Problem Solving Ability, Field Dependent Cognitive Style, Field Independent Cognitive Style

Abstract

This study aims to determine the results of the analysis of students 'problem-solving abilities with Field Dependent and Field Independent cognitive styles in solving students' mathematical problems. The location of this research was conducted at SMP Negeri 4 Ambarawa. This research is a descriptive qualitative research. The determination of research subjects was based on the results of the GEFT test developed by Witkin (1973). The data was collected by means of tests and interviews, qualitative data analysis was carried out with the data reduction stage, the data presentation stage, and the conclusion / verification stage. The results of this study indicate that the students' mathematical problem-solving abilities with a field dependent cognitive style are good at understanding the problem and checking again, in the sufficient category at the problem planning stage, and in the poor category at the stage of implementing the completion plan. And the students' mathematical problem solving abilities with a field independent cognitive style were categorized as good at the stage of understanding the problem, planning for completion, carrying out solutions, and in the sufficient category at the stage of re-checking.

References

Amsal, Bakhtiar. 2013. “Filsafat Ilmu”. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, hal. 91.

Arti kata Gaya. (online) tersedia di: http://kbbi.web.id/Gaya (18 juni 2020)

Akramunnisa dan Andi. “Analisis Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Awal Tinggi Dan Gaya Kognitif Field Independent”. Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo.

Arikunto, S. 2005. “Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi Revisi)”. Jakarta:Bumi Aksara.

Arikunto, S. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta:Adi Mahatya.

Bahrul dan Hayat. 2010. Benchmark International Mutu Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Hal. 212.

Daryanto, dkk. 2012. “Model Pembelajaran Inovatif”. Yogyakarta. Gava Media, hal. 240.

Estiningrum, Tias, dkk. 2019. “Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Melalui Implementasi Pogil Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif”. Semarang.

Haloho Synthia Hotnida. 2016. “Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa Pada Model Pembelajaran Missouri Mathematics Project”. Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Haloho. 2016. “Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Missouri Mathematics Project”. Skripsi online. Semarang. Unnes, hal. 3.

Husna, F,E, dkk. 2014. “Penerapan Strategi React Dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika siswa Kelas X SMAN 1 Batang Anai”. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika.

Indarwahyuni, N.R, Sutinah dan A.H, Rosyidi. 2014. “Profil Kemampuan Siswa Kelas IX-F SMPN 1 Bangsal Mojokerto dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Bentuk Soal Cerita Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Spasial”. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika.

Istiqomah, N. dan E,B, Rahaju. 2014. “Proses Berpikir Siswa Menengah Pertama (SMP) Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika

Kamandoko. 2014. “Profil Intuisi Matematis Peserta Didik Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Field Dependent Dan Field Independent”. IAIN Lampung.

Moleong, L.J. 2016. “Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif”. Jakarta:Rosdakarya. Hal.3

Mulyono dan Abdurrahman. 2012. “Anak Berkesulitan Belajar”. Teori, Diagnosis dan Remediasinya. Jakarta: Reneka Cpta. Hal: 202.

Mulyono dan Abdurrahman. 2012. “Anak Berkesulitan Belajar; Teori, Diagnosis, Remediasinya”. Jakarta: Reneka Cipta. Hal: 204.

Nur, Andi Saparuddin dan Markus. 2018. “Profil Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Di Tinjau dari Perbedaan Gaya Kognitif dan Gender”. Universitas Musamus.

Polya, G. 1973. “How to solve it : A New Aspect of Mathematical Method”. New jersey: Princeton University Press. Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif pada Materi Bnagung Ruang Sisi Lengkung”. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika. 3(2). 144-149.

Panjaitan Fanny Isra Jannah. 2018. “Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Cara Berfikir Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran STAD (Studen Teams Achievement Duvision)”. UIN Sumatera Utara, Medan.

Punaji Setyosari. 2015. “Metode Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pengembangan”. Jakarta:Kencana. Hal. 63.

Runtukahu, dkk. 2014. “Pembelajaran Matematika Dasar Bagi Anak Berkesulitan Belajar”. Yogyakarta: Arr-Ruzz Media, hal. 28.

Salameh, E,M. 2011. A Study of balqa. “Applied Univesrsity Students Cognitive Style”. International Education Studies. 4(3). 189-193.

Salim dan Syahrun. 2015. “Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif”. Bandung:Citapustaka Media. Hal:147.

Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kombinasi. Bandung:Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. 2015. “Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan RND”. Bandung:Alfabeta. Hal.15.

Uji, La Toni. Asikin dan Mulyono. 2018. “Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa Pada Model Pembelajaran Brain Based Learning”. Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Ulya, Himmatul. 2015. “Hubungan Gaya Kognitif Dengan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa”. Universitas Muria Kudus.

Witkin. 1973. “The Role Of Cognitive Style In Academic Performance And In Teacher-Student Relations”. Research Bulletin. New Jersey. Educational Testing Service.

Witkin, H.A. dkk. 1977. “Field Dependent and Field Independent Cognitive Style and Their Educational Implications”. Review of Educational Reaserch.

Yususf, Hartono. 2014. “Matematika; Strategi Pemecahan Masalah”. Yogyaarta: Graha Ilmu, Hal:3.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-04

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020)

Section

Articles

Citation Check

License

An author who publishes in  AFEKSI agrees to the following terms:
  • Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
  • The author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.