Mandatory Bequest (Wasiat Wajibah) in Interfaith Inheritance Cases (A Study of Indonesian Supreme Court Decision No. 16 K/AG/2010 from the Perspective of Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah)

Authors

  • Muhammad Baihaqi Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59698/quru.v4i1.576

Keywords:

Mandatory Bequest, Inheritance, Non-Muslim, Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah

Abstract

A person’s death often gives rise to inheritance disputes, especially when there is a difference of religion between the deceased (the decedent) and the heirs. In Islamic law, the majority of jurists hold that a difference of religion constitutes an impediment to mutual inheritance. Nevertheless, some scholars propose an alternative solution through the mechanism of wasiat wajibah (mandatory bequest) for parties who are legally barred from inheriting. Building on this reality, this study aims to analyze the legal reasoning in the decisions at the first instance, appellate, and cassation levels by using the perspective of Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah, in order to assess the extent to which those decisions reflect principles of justice and public benefit (maṣlaḥah). This research is a library-based study with a descriptive-analytical character. The approaches employed include normative juridical and statutory juridical approaches, while remaining grounded in the overarching objectives of Islamic law (Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah). The findings indicate that Indonesian Supreme Court Decision No. 16 K/AG/2010 expands the application of wasiat wajibah which, under the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), is originally intended only for adopted children and adoptive parents into a solution for contemporary inheritance problems, including for non-Muslim heirs. Through this decision, the Supreme Court determined that parties who are barred from inheriting due to religious difference may still receive a portion of the estate through a mandatory bequest, based on considerations of justice, humanity, and social welfare. This decision is considered consistent with the objectives of Islamic law, particularly the protection of religion, life, and property, because it preserves the core principles of Islamic inheritance law while also providing protection and welfare for those otherwise excluded. The implementation of wasiat wajibah is relevant to Indonesia’s plural society and reflects the orientation of Islamic law toward the public good (maṣlaḥah) of the community. This article recommends: clarifying the regulation of wasiat wajibah in the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) including for heirs of different religions; issuing Supreme Court (MA) technical guidelines to ensure consistent and predictable rulings; and strengthening legal literacy/mediation as well as inheritance planning (wills and hibah) to prevent disputes in line with maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah.

References

Al-Bukhārī, Abu Abdillah Muhammad Ibn Ismail Ibn al-Mugīrah Ibn Bardizbah, Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, Juz 4, Beirūt Libanon: Dār al-Fikr, 1410 H/1990 M.

Anderson, J. N. D., Hukum Islam Di Dunia Modern, terj. Machnun Husein Surabaya: Amarpress, 1991.

Arifin, Bustanul, Pelembagaan Hukum Islam di Indonesia, Akar Sejarah, Hambatan dan Prospeknya, Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 1996.

Basyir, Ahmad Azhar, Hukum Waris Islam, Ed. Revisi, Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2001.

Bakar, Zainal Abidin Abu, Kumpulan Peraturan Perundang-undangan Dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Agama, Cet. 3, Jakarta: Yayasan al-Hikmah, 2013.

Bukhārī, Al-Imam Abu Abdillah Muhammad ibn Ismail ibn al-Mugīrah ibn Bardizbah al-, Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, Juz 4, Beirūt Libanon: Dār al-Fikr, 1410 H/1990 M.

Dahlan, Abdul Aziz, Ensiklopedi Hukun Islam, Jakarta: PT Ikhtiar Baru Van Hoeve, 2000), Jilid 6.

Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia, Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahannya, Jakarta: PT.Tahazed, 2009.

Harahap, M. Yahya, Kedudukan Kewenangan dan Acara Peradilan Agama, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika,2001.

Harahap, Yahya, Informasi Materi Kompilasi Hukum Islam: Mempositifkan Abstraksi Hukum Islam, Di Dalam: Kompilasi Hukum Islam Dan Peradilan Agama Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional, penyunting Cik Hasan Bisri, Jakarta:Logos Wacana Ilmu, 1999.

Hidayat, J.H., 2024. Wasiat Wajibah Untuk Istri Sirri Perspektif Maqaṣid Asy-syarī’ah Jasser Auda (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Agama Denpasar No. 363/Pdt. G/2020/PA. Dps) (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Indonesia).

Hajida, I.Z.N.S., 2021. Disparitas Putusan Pengadilan Agama dalam Sengketa Ahli Waris Non Muslim Perspektif Maqâṣid al-Syarî’ah dan Legal Pluralism (Master's thesis, Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta).

Ḥazm, Ibn, Al-Muhallā, Juz IX, Beirut: Dār Al-Alāq, tt.

Husain, Harun M., Kasasi Sebagai Upaya Hukum, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 1992.

Jazuli, A., Kaidah-kaidah Fikih, Kaidah-kaidah Hukum Islam dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah-masalah yang Praktis, Cet. I, Jakarta: Kencana, 2006.

Kansil, C.S.T. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia, cet. ke-8 Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1989.

Komite Fakultas Syari’ah Universitas al-Azhar Mesir, Hukum Waris, alih bahasa, Addys Aldizar dan Fathurrahman, cet. 1, Jakarta: Senayan Abadi Publishing, 2004.

Kompilasi Hukum Islam

Kurdī, Ahmad al-Hāj al-, Madkhāl al-Fiqhī: Qawāid al-Kulliyyah, Damsascus: Dār al-Ma‟ārif, 1980.

Manẓūr, Ibn, Lisān al-Arb, Cet. III, Beirut: DārṢādir, 1414 H), VIII.

Mu’allim, Amir dan Yusdani, Konfigurasi Pemikiran Hukum Islam, Yogyakarta: UIIPress Indonesia, 1999.

N.E. Algra dan H.R.W.Gokkel, Kamus Istilah Hukum, Fochema Andreae Belanda Indonesia (Fochema Andreae"s- Rechtsgeleerd Handvoordenboek), terj. Saleh Adiwinata, A. Teboeki dan Boerhanuddin St. Batoeah, (Bandung: Bina Cipta, 1983).

Nugraheni, Budi, Destri, Haniah Ilhami, Pembaruan Hukum Kewarisan Islam di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press, 2014.

Qardhāwī, Yusuf al-, Fikih Minoritas, Fatwa Kontemporer Terhadap Kehidupan Kaum Muslimin Di Tengah Masyarakat Non Muslim, Cet. 1, Jakarta: PT. Zikrul Hakim, 2004.

Qazwaini, Abdullah Muhammad bin Yazid al –Abu, Sunan Ibn Majah, jilid II, Beiru: Dar al-Fikr,tt., Hadis no. 2710.

Qudāmah, Ibnu, al-Mughnī, Kairo: Matba‘ah al-Iman, t.th.), IX.

Quṭnī, Al-Dār, Sunan Dār al-Quṭ nī, Cet.I, Beirūt: Dār al-Ma‟rifah, 2001), jilid III.

Rahman, Fatchur, Ilmu Waris, cet. II, Bandung: al-Ma‘arif, 1981.

Rahman, Fazlur, Islam, alih bahasa: Ahsin Muhammad, Bandung: Pustaka, 1994.

Rofiq, Ahmad, Hukum Islam di Indonesia, Jakarta: PT raja Grafindo Persada, 1997.

Sābiq, Sayyid, Fiqh as-Sunnah, (Beirūt: Dār al-Fikr, 1392 H), Juz III, hlm, 622.

Salinan Putusan MA nomor 16 K/AG/2010.

Salinan Putusan PA Nomor: 732/Pdt .G/2008 /PA.Mks (Lihat dalam lampiran).

Salinan Putusan PTA Nomor: 59/Pdt .G/2009/PTA.Mks (Lihat dalam lampiran).

Soekanto, Soejono, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, cet. III, Yogyakarta: UII Press, 1986.

Soekanto, Soerjono, & Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suatu Tinjauan Singkat), Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2001.

Surakhmad, Winarno, Pengantar Penelitian Ilmiah: Dasar, Metode dan Teknik, ed. Ke-7, Bandung: Tarsito, 1994.

Suriasumantri, Jujun S., Filsafat Ilmu Sebuah Pengantar Populer, cet. 4, Jakarta: SinarHarapan, 1987.

Suyuţī, Jalāl ad-Din ‘Abd ar-Rahman as-, al-Asybāh wa an-Nazāir fī al-Furū’, Beirūt: Dār al-Fikr, 1415 H/1995 M.

Syatibī, Abu Ishaq al-, al-Muwāfaqāt fi Usul asy-Syarī’ah, jilid 1, Beirut: Darul Ma’rifah, 1997.

Undang-undang tentang Enam Hukum, UU RI No. 24 th. 2003 Mahkamah Konsitusi, UU RI No. 22 Th. 2004 KomisiYudisial, UU RI No. 5 Th. 2004 Mahkamah Agung, UU RI No. 4 Th. 2004 Kekuasaan Kehakiman, UU RI No. 16 Th. 2004 Kejaksaan RI, UU RI No. 18 Th. 2003 Advokat, Cet. II, Jakarta: Asa Mandiri, 2007.

Wehr, Hans, A Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic, J. Milton Cowan (ed), London: MacDonald & Evans LTD, 1980.

Zahrah, Muhamad Abu, Ilm Ushūl al-Fiqh, cet ke-10, Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 2007.

Zakiah Darajat, Ilmu Fiqh, Jilid, III, Yogyakarta: PT Dana Bhakti Wakaf, 1995.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-02

How to Cite

Muhammad Baihaqi. (2026). Mandatory Bequest (Wasiat Wajibah) in Interfaith Inheritance Cases (A Study of Indonesian Supreme Court Decision No. 16 K/AG/2010 from the Perspective of Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah). QURU’: Journal of Family Law and Culture, 4(1), 121–148. https://doi.org/10.59698/quru.v4i1.576