Navigating the Ethics and Legalities of Surrogacy in India: A Critical Analysis of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act of 2021
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59698/quru.v3i2.430Keywords:
Surrogate, Compensated Surrogacy, Women Rights, Feminist Studies, Reproductive LaborAbstract
This paper aims to critically examine the ethical and legal dimensions of compensated surrogacy in India within the context of the enactment of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act of 2021, which bans commercial surrogacy and allows only altruistic (non-paid) surrogacy. Through a feminist critical approach, this paper explores the tensions between three main perspectives in the surrogacy discourse: abolitionist (calling for a total ban), reformist (advocating for strict regulations), and libertarian (emphasizing individual freedom and market forces). The research method used is a qualitative study based on document analysis and literature review. The author analyzes national legal sources such as the Surrogacy Regulation Act of 2021, and compares India's legal framework with international practices in other countries such as the United States. In addition, the author examines previous studies on the experiences of surrogate mothers, their socio-economic conditions, and the cultural narratives that influence public perceptions of surrogacy. The analysis reveals that a total ban on commercial surrogacy could create new forms of exploitation by disregarding the value of women's reproductive labor and limiting their economic choices. Previous commercial surrogacy practices in India have indeed shown various issues, such as social inequalities between surrogates and intended parents, as well as weak legal protection. However, rather than endorsing a complete ban, this paper advocates for the implementation of a regulated compensated surrogacy model that acknowledges the physical and emotional labor of surrogates while providing adequate legal and ethical protections. In conclusion, the author emphasizes that a balanced regulation, rather than an outright ban, would better address the socio-economic realities of women in India. By offering an approach that combines reproductive autonomy and legal protection, this model creates a realistic middle ground between unlimited commercialization and the altruistic approach that fails to respond to the real needs of surrogate mothers.
References
B.K. Rothman, Recreating Motherhood: Ideology and Technology in a Patriarchal Society 238 (Norton, New York, 1989).
Banerjee, Sneha, and Prabha Kotiswaran. “Divine labours, devalued work: The continuing saga of India’s surrogacy regulation” 5(1) Indian Law Review 85 (2021).
Chandran, Aishwarya, “Valuing women’s labour: some notes on the ‘compensated’ model of surrogacy” 17(2) Journal of South Asian Development 195 (2022).
Department-Related Parliament Standing Committee, supra note 48, 11.
Ekman, Kajsa Ekis, Being and Being Bought: Prostitution, Surrogacy & the Split Self 160 (Spinifix Press, Australia, 2013).
G Corea, The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial Insemination to Artificial Wombs 214 (Harper & Row, 1985).
J.F. Daar (1997) “Regulating reproductive technologies: panacea or paper tiger” 34 Houston Law Review 609 (1997).
Jan Balaz v. Anand Municipality 2009 SCC OnLine Guj 3913.
Jayashree Wad v. Union of India, (Writ Petition 95 of 2015).
Kumar, Alok Prasanna, Rethinking the Surrogacy Bill, (Aug. 19, 2017), available at https://www.epw.in/journal/2017/33/law-and-society/rethinkingsurrogacy-bill.html?0=ip_login_no_cache%3D42df720d0e0b3d641cfeffd587985597 (last visited October 24, 2019).
“Mimi and the Surrogacy Bazaar of India - India Art Review,” accessed May 6, 2025, https://indiaartreview.com/stories/mimi-hindi-film-surrogacy-motherhood-controversy-analysis/.
Mishra, Gargi, “Our notions of motherhood” (Aug. 9, 2019), available at https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/surrogacy-regulation-bill-laws-in-indiacommercial-
Mutcherson, K.M. “Transformative reproduction” 16(1) Journal of Gender, Race and Justice 187 (2013).
Nayak, Preeti, “The Three Ms of Commercial Surrogacy in India: Mother, Money and Medical Market” in Sayantani DasGupta and Shamita Das Dasgupta (eds.), Globalization and Transnational Surrogacy in India Outsourcing Life 12 (Lexington Books, United Kingdom, 2014).
Pande, Amrita, Wombs in Labor Transnational Commercial Surrogacy in India (Columbia University Press, New York, 2014).
S Allan, “The surrogate in commercial surrogacy: legal and ethical considerations” in P Gerber and K O’Byrne (eds.) Surrogacy,Law, and Human Rights 113 (Aldershot: Ashgate).
S.S. Boone (1992) “Slavery and contract motherhood: a ‘racialized’ objection to the autonomy arguments” in H.B. Holmes (ed.) Issues inReproductive Technology: AnAnthology 349 (New York: Garland).
SAMA – Resource Group for Women and Health, “Birthing A Market: A Study on Commercial Surrogacy” New Delhi (2012).
Sara L. Ainsworth, “Bearing Children, Bearing Risks: Feminist Leadership for Progressive Regulation of Compensated Surrogacy in the United States” 89(4) Washington Law Review (2014).
Saravanan, Sheela, A Transnational Feminist View of Surrogacy Biomarkets in India 90 (Springer, Singapore, 2018).
Satish, Mrinal, “National Law University, Delhi, Memorandum on The Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2016” (2017) available at https://cpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/blogs.cornell.edu/dist/2/7529/files/2017/08/CLPG-NLU-Delhi-Cornell-Memorandum-on-Surrogacy-Bill-2016-1s985d1.pdf (last visited on Jul.10, 2024).
Sayantani DasGupta and Shamita Das Dasgupta, “Shifting sands: transnational surrogacy, e-motherhood, and nation building” In: Sayantani DasGupta and Shamita Das Dasgupta (eds.) Globalization andTransnational Surrogacy in India:Outsourcing Life 67 (Lexington Books, United Kingdom, 2014).
Shapiro, Julie, “For a Feminist considering surrogacy, is compensation really the key question?” 89 Washington Law Review 1345 (2011).
Sharmila Rudrappa, “India outlawed commercial surrogacy – clinics are finding loopholes” (Oct. 24, 2017), available at http://theconversation.com/india-outlawedcommercial-surrogacy-clinics-are-finding-loopholes-81784
Sharon Bassan, “Different but same: A call for a joint pro-active regulation of cross-border egg and surrogacy markets” 28(1) Health Matrix 323 (2019).
Soumya Kashyap and Priyanka Tripathi, “The Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021: A Critique” 15(5) Asian Bioethics Review 18 (2023).
Thirani, Neha, “A Controversial Ban on Commercial Surrogacy Could Leave Women in India With Even Fewer Choices” The Time (Jun. 30, 2021) available at https://time.com/6075971/commercial-surrogacy-ban-india/(last accessed on Jul. 10, 2024).
V Madge, “Gestational surrogacy in India: the problem of technology and poverty” in Sayantani DasGupta and Shamita Das Dasgupta (eds.) Globalization and Transnational Surrogacy in India: Outsourcing Life 55 (Lexington Books, United Kingdom, 2014).

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aparna Singh, Vidhi Krishnan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Quru': Journal of Family Law and Culture