Itsbat Marriage of Sirri Polygamy in Progressive Law Perspective, Case Study of Decision Number 5065/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Clp
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59698/quru.v2i3.233Keywords:
Itsbat Marriage, Sirri Polygamy, Progressive Law, PA Cilacap, Sirri MarriageAbstract
A case concerning an application for itsbat marriage at the Cilacap Religious Court filed by a husband and his second wife. Their marriage was conducted siri without the knowledge of the first wife. This application was filed to obtain legalisation of their siri marriage so that it could be officially recorded, which has implications for the legality of children born from the marriage and other civil rights. The purpose of this research is to find out the considerations and factors behind a Judge granting a marriage isbat application. then the second objective is to analyse the results of Decision Number 5065/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Clp in terms of progressive law. This type of research is library research using a normative juridical approach using progressive legal theory. The conclusion in Itsbat Marriage Case in Decision Number 5065/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Clp is that the judge considers aspects of humanity, social justice, and benefits for all parties involved. From the aspect of substantive justice, the decision reflects an approach that takes into account the best interests of the child, harmony in the family, and the protection of women's rights. In the context of the judge's background, the granting of this decision may have been influenced by a deep understanding of the social and cultural values of the local community, as well as a broad understanding of religious norms relating to marriage. The judge may also have considered the urgency of protecting children's rights and the need to resolve family conflicts fairly and peacefully. As such, the granting of this decision demonstrates the judge's commitment to achieving substantive justice in accordance with the social, cultural and religious values of the community, while ensuring the protection of the rights of the individuals involved in the case.
References
Agung, Mahkamah. “Pedoman Teknis Administrasi Dan Teknis Peradilan Agama,(Buku II).” Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Agama, 2010.
Al-Qadlaya, E. “Problematika Seputar Hukum Isbat Nikah Dalam Sistem Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia* Mardoni.” Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam P-ISSN 2809 (n.d.): 6681.
Ali, Zainuddin. “Hukum Perdata Islam Di Indonesia.” (No Title), 2007.
Alissa, Evalina, Faizah Bafadhal, Suhermi Suhermi, Meri Yarni, and Diana Amir. “Meningkatkan Pemahaman Tentang Pentingnya Itsbat Nikah Dalam Perkawinan Siri Di Desa Bukit Baling Kecamatan Sekernan Kabupaten Muaro Jambi.” Joong-Ki: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat 3, no. 2 (2024): 287–94.
Atmasasmita, Romli. “Teori Hukum Integratif: Rekonstruksi Terhadap Teori Hukum Pembangunan Dan Teori Hukum Progresif,” 2012.
Badriyah, Siti Malikhatun. Sistem Penemuan Hukum Dalam Masyarakat Prismatik. Sinar Grafika, 2022.
Bafadhal, Faizah, Itsbat Nikah Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Status Perkawinan Menurut Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia, Junal Ilmu Hukum, 2014.
Bello, Petrus C K L. “Hukum Dan Moralitas: Sebuah Analisa Kritis Terhadap Filsafat Hukum Herbert Lionel Adolphus Hart.” Driyarkara School of Philosophy, 2011.
Cardidi, Jajang. “Kajian Hermeneutis Terhadap Makna Keyakinan Hakim Dan Peranannya Untuk Putusan (Vonis) Pidana.” E-Journal Graduate Unpar 1, no. 2 (2014): 14–30.
Compilation of Islamic Law
Dictionary, Oxford. “Oxford Learner’s Pocket Dictionary.” New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia, Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahannya, Jakarta: PT.Tahazed, 2009
Decision of PA Cilacap Number: 5065/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Clp, pp, 1-21
Fitri, Abd Basit Misbachul, and Abdul Wahid Azza. “Nikah Bawah Tangan Dan Itsbat Nikah.” Salimiya: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Keagamaan Islam 3, no. 3 (2022): 131–43.
Fauzi, Ahmad Cholid, Kedudukan Hukum Itsbat Nikah Poligami Sirri, Jurnal USM Law Review Vol 1 No 1 Tahun 2018.
Gunawan, Edi, and Budi Rahmat Hakim. “Pelaksanaan Itsbat Nikah Pasca Berlakunya Uu No. 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan Di Pengadilan Agama.” Syariah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran 18, no. 2 (2018): 258–83.
Habibi, Nur. “Efektifitas Pelaksanaan Fungsi Pengawasan Komisi Yudisial Dalam Mengawasi Hakim Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kekuasaan Kehakiman,” n.d.
Harahap, M Yahya. “Kedudukan Kewenangan Dan Acara Peradilan Agama (Undang-Undang No. 7 Tahun 1989).” Jakarta: Pustaka Kartini 89 (1997).
Helmi, Avin Fadilla. “Aspek Psikologis Penuntut Umum Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana.” Psikologika: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Psikologi 2, no. 3 (1997): 19–26.
Huda, Mahmud. “Yurisprudensi Isbat Nikah Dalam Pasal 7 Kompilasi Hukum Islam.” Religi: Jurnal Studi Islam 5, no. 1 (2014): 43–71.
Khairuddin, Khairuddin, and Julianda Julianda. “Pelaksanaan Itsbat Nikah Keliling Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Ketertiban Pencatatan Nikah (Studi Kasus Di Kabupaten Bireuen).” SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 1, no. 2 (2017): 319–51.
Kompilasi Hukum Islam
Lesmana, Yordan Elang Mulya. “Modalitas Hakim Progresif.” Verstek 8, no. 2 (n.d.).
Lubis, Suhrawardi K. “Etika Profesi Hukum,” 2006.
Manan, H Abdul. Aneka Masalah Hukum Perdata Islam Di Indonesia. Prenada Media, 2022.
Marilang, Marilang. “Menimbang Paradigma Keadilan Hukum Progresif.” Jurnal Konstitusi 14, no. 2 (2017): 315–31.
“Menggali Karakter Hukum Progresif.” Accessed May 30, 2024. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/menggali-karakter-hukum-progresif-lt529c62a965ce3/.
Musyafa’ah, Nur Lailatul, and Jaih Mubarok. Peradilan Agama Di Indonesia. Pustaka Bani Quraisy, 2004.
Nazah, Farida Nurun, and Husnia Husnia. “Kepastian Hukum Itsbat Nikah Dalam Hukum Perkawinan.” JHR (Jurnal Hukum Replik) 6, no. 2 (2018): 241–63.
Nugroho, Wahyu. “Rule Breaking Dan Integritas Penegak Hukum Progresif Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi Pejabat Daerah.” Jurnal Yudisial 7, no. 1 (2014): 70–87.
Nuryadi, H Deni, and M H Sh. “Teori Hukum Progresif Dan Penerapannya Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DE’JURE: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum 1, no. 2 (2016): 394–408.
“Pa-Simalungun.Go.Id/Id - Pengawasan Terhadap Hakim Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif Di Indonesia.” Accessed May 30, 2024. https://pa-simalungun.go.id/index.php/lain-lain/artikel/1029-pengawasan-terhadap-hakim-dalam-perspektif-hukum-progresif-di-indonesia.
Pakarti, Muhammad Husni Abdulah, Iffah Fathiah, Itsbat Nikah Sebuah Upaya Mendapatkan Mengakuan Negara (Studi Pengadilan Agama Garut)”, Tahkim, Jurnal Peradaban dan Hukum Islam. Vol.5 No.2 (Oktober, 2022)
“Paradigma Hukum Progresif - Pengadilan Negeri Palopo.” Accessed May 30, 2024. https://www.pn-palopo.go.id/index.php/media-center/artikel/184-paradigma-hukum-progresif.
Partanto, Pius A, and M Dahlan Al Barry. “Kamus Ilmiah Populer.” Surabaya: Arkola 37 (1994): 23.
Pradana, Ellemmia Lorenza. “Pendekatan Hukum Progresif Dalam Studi Islam.” JURNAL LENTERA: Kajian Keagamaan, Keilmuan Dan Teknologi 22, no. 1 (2023): 54–62.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Hukum Dalam Jagat Ketertiban (Bacaan Mahasiswa Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Universitas Diponegoro). UKI press, 2006.
———. Membedah Hukum Progresif. Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2006.
———. “Menuju Produk Hukum Progresif.” Makalah Diskusi Terbatas Pada Fakultas Hukum Undip, Alumni, Semarang, 2004.
Rahardjo, Satjipto, and Khudzaifah Dimyati. Ilmu Hukum: Pencarian, Pembebasan Dan Pencerahan. Muhammadiyah University Press, 2004.
Rahayu, Ninik. “Politik Hukum Itsbat Nikah.” Musãwa Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Islam 12, no. 2 (2016): 279–94.
Rahayu, Yusti Probowati. “Peranan Etnik Dan Daya Tarik Wajah Terdakwa Terhadap Putusan Hukuman.” Universitas Gadjah Mada, 1995.
Ravena, Dey. “Mencandra Hukum Progresif Dan Peran Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia.” Syiar Hukum 9, no. 3 (2007): 190–201.
———. “Wacana Konsep Hukum Progresif Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika 23, no. 2 (2010): 155–66.
Rifai, Ahmad, Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim dalam Persepektif Hukum Progresif, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.
“Sabda Rasul Soal Hakim: Satu Masuk Surga, Dua Masuk Neraka | Republika Online.” Accessed May 30, 2024. https://iqra.republika.co.id/berita/s2q11m366/sabda-rasul-soal-hakim-satu-masuk-surga-dua-masuk-neraka?
Soehartono, Soehartono. “Mengembangkan Pemikiran Hakim Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa.” Yustisia 3, no. 1 (n.d.).
Sukarno Aburaera, Dkk, S H Muhadar, M H Maskun, and L L M SH. “Filsafat Hukum: Teori Dan Praktik.” Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2014.
Sunarto, Peran Aktif Hakim Dalam Perkara Perdata,, Jakarta: Prenada Media Group., 2014.
Sutrisno Hadi, Metodologi Reseat, Yogyakarta: Andi Offset, 1990.
Sururie, Ramdani Wahyu. “Polemik Di Seputar Hukum Isbat Nikah Dalam Sistem Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 11, no. 2 (2017): 233–46.
Sutrisno, Slamet Prasetyo, Fadjrin Wira Perdana, Surnata Surnata, Yohan Wibisono, and Bambang Setiawan. “Upaya Hukum Luar Biasa Peninjauan Kembali Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif.” Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains 2, no. 12 (2021): 2109–17.
Law No 1 Year 1974
Zuhriah, Erfaniah. Peradilan Agama Indonesia: Sejarah Pemikiran Dan Realita. UIN Maliki Press, 2009.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ummu Salamah Nur Rohmawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Quru': Journal of Family Law and Culture
.png)
