Dispute Between Waqf Land Vs. Inherited Land (Analysis of the Judge's Presumption as Evidence in Case No. 174/Pdt.G/ 2017/MS.Bna)

Authors

  • Muhammad Husnul Ar-Raniry State Islamic University of Banda Aceh.Jl. Sheikh Abdur Rauf Kopelma Darussalam Banda Aceh. Banda Aceh City. Postal Code, 23111
  • Siti Jum’ah Ar-Raniry State Islamic University of Banda Aceh Jl. Sheikh Abdur Rauf Kopelma Darussalam Banda Aceh. City/District, Banda Aceh City. Postal Code, 23111

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59698/quru.v2i1.183

Keywords:

Presumption Evidence, Waqf, Heirs, Inheritance, Dispute.

Abstract

This research discusses the invalidity of the Deed of Replacement of Waqf Pledge Deed on land belonging to the heir who rejected APIAW whose final implication at the appeal stage was that the deed was null and void because contrary to the evidence presented by the plaintiff and the judge's considerations in the form of the judge's guess. The issue of concern is whether the judge's opinion as one of the judge's considerations at the cassation stage can be used as evidence in this case. The research method used is qualitative with a normative juridical approach. The results of the research show that judges can use their assumptions as evidence in their considerations when deciding cases with the assumption that the evidence presented by the plaintiff and defendant has not been able to convince the judge. However, in the end, based on the judge's estimates, it could be concluded that APAIW and the Certificate of Ownership (SHM) had no legal force (not inkracht).

References

Abdullah, Muslem. (2019). Tantangan Pelaksanaan Wakaf Tanah dalam Sistem Perundang-Undangan Indonesia. Aceh: Lembaga Kajian Konstitusi Indonesia.

Abdoeh,"Nor Mohammad, Tinjauan Filosofis Terhadap Undang-undang Nomor 41 Tahun 2004 Tentang Wakaf." Iqtisad: Reconstruction of Justice and Welfare for Indonesia 7.1 (2020).

Al-‘Utsaimin, Syikh Muhammad bin Shalih. (2008). Pendahuluan Wakaf, Hibah, dan Wasiat Menurut Al-Qur’an dan Sunnah. Jakarta: Pustaka Imam Asy-Syfi’i.

Ali, Achmadi. Wiwie Heryani. (2012). Asas-Asas Hukum Pembuktian Perdata. Jakarta: Kencana.

Azzuhaili, Wahbah. (2011). Fiqih Islam Wa Adillatuhu. Jakarta: Gema Insani.

Azzuhaili, Wahbah. (2012). Tafsir Al-Basith (Al-Fatihah-At-Taubah). Jakarta: Gema Insani.

Azzuhaili, Wahbah. (2013). Tafsir Al-Munir. Jakarta: Gema Insani.

Diantha, I. Made Pasek; SH, M. S. Metodologi penelitian hukum normatif dalam justifikasi teori hukum. Prenada Media, 2016.

Hadrian, Endang. lukman Hakim. (2020). Hukum Acar Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Budi Utama.

Iim Fahimah, “Sejarah Perkembangan Hukum Waris di Indonesia,” Nuansa: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Kemasyarakatan, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2018.

Katsir, Ibnu. (2004). Tafsir Ibnu Katsir. Bogor: Pustaka Imam Asy-Syafi’i.

Mahkamah Agung, “Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 7 K/Ag/2018”

Mahkamah Syar’iyyah Aceh, “Putusan Nomor 28/Pdt.G/2017/MS-Aceh”

Mahkamah Syar’iyyah, “Putusan Nomor 0147/Pdt.G/2016/Ms. Bna” (Banda Aceh, 2017).

Ovita Dyah Kumala Sari and S H Syafrudin Yudowibowo, “Kekuatan Pembuktian Persangkaan Sebagai Alat Bukti Yang Sah Pada Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama,” Jurnal Verstek, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2016,

Sabiq, Sayyid. (2012). Fiqih Sunnah 5, Tahkik dan Tahkrij Muhammad Nasruddin Al-Albani. Jakarta: Cakrawala Publishing.

Sulistiani, Siska Lis. (2018). Hukum Perdata Islam Penerapan Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Bisnis Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018.

Tim Penyusun Naskah Fiqih Wakaf, Fikih Wakaf, (Jakarta: Direktorat Pemberdayaan Wakaf Direktorat Jendral Bimbingan Masyarakat Islam Depertemen Agama RI, 2007).

Tinuk Dwi Cahyani, Hukum Waris dalam Islam (Malang: Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, 2018)

Undang-Undang RI, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.

Undang-Undang RI, Undang-Undang Nomor 41 Tahun 2004 (Jakarta, 2004), Lembaran Negara Tahun 1977 Nomor 159, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 4459.

Undang-Undang RI, Undang-Undang Nomor 41 Tahun 2004, Lembaran Negara Tahun 2004 Nomor 159, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 4459.

Yuli Heriyanti, “Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Bukti Persangkaan Ssebagai Alat Bukti Perkara Perdata Dalam Putusan Niet Ontvankelijk Verklaard (No)(Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Negeri Bangkinang),” Jurnal Pahlawan, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2020.

Zulkifli. (2020). Panduan Praktis Memahami Zakat Infaq, Shadaqah, Wakaf dan Pajak. Yogyakarta: Kalimedia.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-15

How to Cite

Muhammad Husnul, & Siti Jum’ah. (2024). Dispute Between Waqf Land Vs. Inherited Land (Analysis of the Judge’s Presumption as Evidence in Case No. 174/Pdt.G/ 2017/MS.Bna). QURU’: Journal of Family Law and Culture, 2(1), 96–119. https://doi.org/10.59698/quru.v2i1.183

Issue

Section

Articles